BIO FPX 1000 Assessment 6 Media Misinformation Source Evaluation Form

BIO FPX 1000 Assessment 6 Media Misinformation Source Evaluation Form

BIO FPX 1000 Assessment 6 Media Misinformation Source Evaluation Form

Student name

Capella University

BIO-FPX 1000

Professor’s Name

Submission Date

  •  Media Misinformation Source Evaluation Form

Date: ___________

Name: ___________

1.      Author or Media Producer

Dr. Sun Kyong Lee is an Associate Professor of the School of Media and Communication at Korea University. Her expertise lies in communication and social behavior, where she has conducted a lot of research on the effects of misinformation, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Her research investigates the impacts of exposure to vaccine misinformation on vaccine hesitancy and refusal. Lee has written numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals, making contributions to the comprehension of the role of misinformation in making decisions related to health, especially during the pandemic of COVID-19.

2.      Publisher – Organization or Sponsor

Scientific Reports has a wide scope of scientific disciplines, with research being published in the areas of biology, physics, chemistry, and health sciences, among others. It is an esteemed source of scholarly articles and is trusted to be rigorously peer-reviewed. Being an academic journal, its credibility will be supported by its connection with Nature Research, which is a renowned publisher within the scientific market. Nature.com (the publisher) is a good, scholarly (.com) source, but not to be confused with other sources that may lack regulation, such as blogs or personal websites.

3.      Point of View or Bias

The research that Lee et al. (2022) conducted does not seem to have any apparent bias. The article is devoted to the dissemination of misinformation concerning the COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy, presenting an analysis based on data and research, as opposed to opinion or agenda. The article is in the Journal of Scientific Reports, a peer-reviewed journal of good reputation for impartiality and scientific rigor. There is no obvious political or philosophical bias in Scientific Reports, because it publishes research in a diverse set of fields, emphasizing scientific objectivity over a particular ideological position. The emphasis on evidence-based research is a reason why the publication is not highly biased in reporting the findings.

4.      Intended Audience

The target audience of the article by Lee et al. (2022) consists mainly of academic and professional readers, including researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, who have an interest in learning about the influence of misinformation on vaccine hesitancy. 

5.      Content

The article by Lee et al. (2022) is not an opinion or propaganda, but a factual research and analysis of data. The paper discusses the consequences of misinformation on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy using empirical data, which may involve surveys and statistical analysis, as well as other common scientific research methods. The publication is in Scientific Reports, a reputable, peer-reviewed journal that ensures the quality of the content. Besides, the authors also refer to credible sources and apply time-tested research techniques to prove their results, which contributes to the authenticity of the presented information.

6.      Currency

Lee et al.’s (2022) article is up-to-date, being published in 2022, and concerns the issues that are topical to the current COVID-19 vaccination campaigns and misinformation.



References

Lee, S. K., Sun, J., Jang, S., & Connelly, S. (2022). Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific Reports12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6

Fill out the form to Access the Free Sample Paper





    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



    Get this Sample in your Email Instantly!
    Fill The Form To Get Help !





      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



      Scroll to Top