HIM FPX 3640 Assessment 1
Sample
Free Download
EHR Adoptions and Benefits
Student Name
Capella University
HIM FPX3640
Professor’s Name
Submission Date
The use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) in healthcare organizations has transformed how patient information is handled, documented, and accessed. Since it is essential to focus on how healthcare providers transition to digital records instead of the conventional paper-based records, understanding the capabilities, advantages, issues, and the different EHR implementations is essential (Adeniyi et al., 2024).
This assignment outlines key features of EHR implementation at Michigan Medical PC (MMPC), including the orientation sessions, nomenclature, documentation rules, data retrieval, and comparison of systems. In addition, it covers benefits, weaknesses, and difficulties of EHR systems, which provides a holistic view of the present revolution of healthcare technology.
Case Summary
A two-physician primary care site, Michigan Medical PC (MMPC) in Coopersville, switched to Epic out of the Medical Manager EMR system because of its restrictions in functionality and scalability. Although they had been utilizing the practice management and EMR systems of Medical Manager over a period of several years, the requirements of the growing needs of the practice and the increased network of MMPC called for a change. Dr. Gadbois, an early EMR adopter, recommended Epic because of its integration abilities, data sharing, and ability to support large multispecialty groups.
Despite the benefits of the current system, including e-prescribing, access to patient information using a web application, and reduced overhead, Epic needs to enhance documentation, improve accuracy of coding, assist in tracking preventive care, and allow chronic disease management and patient engagement through online portals. The Coopersville crew, which already is technology-oriented, anticipates a smooth changeover with higher long-term effectiveness and quality of care.
Features of an EHR System
Based on the MMPC Coopersville case study, the features of a successful EHR system, including Epic, are illustrated by the ability to streamline workflows, enhance patient safety, and encourage providers to communicate with one another. To facilitate the process of integrating care, Epic offers such capabilities as real-time data sharing, clinical decision support tools, e-prescribing, and preventive care tracking, which align with the aims of MMPC to deliver coordinated and effective healthcare services (Al Ani et al., 2022).
The patient portal enables patients to view their records, place refill orders, and contact providers, thus promoting proactive participation by patients. Additionally, Epic offers data protection and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, which is pertinent due to the concern of privacy and legal responsibility (Calduch et al., 2021).
Advantages and drawbacks of the EHR
The advantages of the Epic EHR system can be found in the MMPC Coopersville case study, where the system has improved care coordination, increased the accuracy of patient records, and improved patient safety. The benefit of accessing data in real time assists providers in making well-informed decisions in real-time, reducing medical errors, and avoiding unnecessary or redundant tests. An example is that the built-in clinical decision support system at Epic alerts clinicians about potential drug interactions or abnormal outcomes, and this way, enhances patient outcomes.
It also improves communication among departments and facilities, contributing to continuity of care (Adeniyi et al., 2024). However, as experienced in MMPC’s case, the implementation of Epic also brought challenges, including high initial costs of installation, maintenance, as well as training of the staff (Mensah et al., 2022). Issues like compatibility with external systems and patient privacy were also critical issues that had to be addressed (M. & Chacko, 2021). All these advantages and disadvantages emphasize the issues associated with EHR adoption and the need to plan the implementation properly.
Limitations to EHR Adoption
The MMPC Coopersville case study had certain issues with the Epic EHR system adoption, which were indicative of larger issues in EHR implementation. The initial obstacle was that the initial cost of acquisition and installation of the system was very high, and it was a huge burden on the budget of this rural facility (and most small healthcare providers in general) (Suryanarayan et al., 2021). Moreover, the process of training that was necessary in ensuring that staff were able to use the system effectively was time-consuming and used resources.
Some of the staff members were not accepting changes since they were used to paper-based workflows and were reluctant to embrace the change to digital record-keeping. There were also interoperability issues that occurred in an attempt to share the patient data with other providers who were not Epic users. Finally, questions of data privacy/security had to be monitored at all times so that the patient data would remain safe.
EHR Applications: Comparison
Epic, the EHR platform used in the MMPC Coopersville case study, was selected due to its broad functionality and its successful experience in larger health systems. The user-friendly interface of Epic positively affected clinician efficiency when interacting with patients by streamlining the workflow and demonstrating more effective documentation, and the high cost of the tool was an obstacle to the smaller rural setting (Pinevich et al., 2021). Instead, Cerner, known to be scalable and able to adjust to various sizes of organizations, was not popular due to the belief that it was complicated with a greater learning curve among the employees (Paolillo et al., 2023).
Integration with smaller external providers not on the same system (also reflective of wider industry challenges) was still problematic at MMPC (both Epic and Cerner are intensely interested in interoperability), but it was a problem that did not vanish (Al Ani et al., 2022). Although Epic managed to comply with the HIPAA regulations and provide excellent data security features, the protocols offered by the company had to be tailored to the specific requirements of MMPC.
Conclusion
Although the EHR implementation provides great benefits in terms of patient care, such as improved coordination, safety, and efficiency, there are also challenges of transitioning to EHR systems that healthcare organizations need to overcome. This assignment has made me a better-informed person regarding operating EHR systems, terminology and standards, and the need to access correct data.
The analysis of the different EHR applications also evokes the importance of the exceedingly careful selection process based on the needs and resources of a specific organization. Knowing the drawbacks of EHRs and the positive aspects of the innovation, healthcare providers can make a well-informed decision to establish improved patient outcomes and healthier operational processes of healthcare in the future.
Step-By-Step Instructions to write
HIM FPX3640 Assessment 1
To get step-by-step instructions for the HIM FPX3640 Assessment 1, contact fpxassessment.com.
References for
HIM-FPX 3640 Assessment 1
Below are the references for HIM FPX 3640 Assessment 1 EHR Adoptions and Benefits:
Al Ani, M., Garas, G., Hollingshead, J., Cheetham, D., Athanasiou, T., & Patel, V. (2022). Which electronic health record system should we use? – A systematic review. Medical Principles and Practice, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1159/000525135
Calduch, E., Muscat, N., Krishnamurthy, R. S., & Ortiz, D. (2021). Technological progress in electronic health record system optimization: Systematic review of systematic literature reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 152(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104507
M., S., & Chacko, A. M. (2021, January 1). Interoperability issues in EHR systems: Research directions. ScienceDirect; Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128193143000021
Paolillo, M. B., Mohr, D., Levy, D. R., Cutrona, S. L., Anderson, E., Rucci, J., Helfrich, C., Sayre, G., & Rinne, S. T. (2023). Assessing electronic health record (EHR) use during a major EHR transition: An innovative mixed methods approach. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 38(4), 999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08318-w
Pinevich, Y., Clark, K. J., Harrison, A. M., Pickering, B. W., & Herasevich, V. (2021). Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(04), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733909
Suryanarayanan, P., Epstein, E. A., Malvankar, A., Lewis, B. L., DeGenaro, L., Liang, J. J., Tsou, C.-H., & Pathak, D. (2021). Timely and efficient AI insights on EHR: System design. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2020, 1180. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075522/
Capella Best Professor to Choose
HIM FPX 3640
- Dr Howard Moskowitz
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery
