NURS FPX 9010 Assessment 5 VCI Summary

VCI Summary

Student name

Capella University

NURS FPX 9010

Professor name

Submission date

Virtual check-in (VCI) emphasized the promotion of the capstone proposal process, the issue of revisions to the institutional review board (IRB), and the practicum components. The quality enhancement project focused on improving follow-up compliance for a telehealth clinic and patient adherence to treatment in an outpatient psychiatric clinic was discussed. Attention was given to preparing the VCI summary in a professional manner and incorporating the review feedback into the preparation of the proposal and IRB submission. Exclusion of demographic data and confirmation of the number of patients (40–60).

Meeting Details

The virtual check-in was conducted during the practicum project phase on May 01, for approximately 25 minutes. The DNP student, the faculty mentor, and the site preceptor in a psychiatric outpatient setting were the participants involved. The meeting focused on IRB requirements, project implementation, and documentation of the project, which covered the data collection methods and compliance tracking. Faculty gave very clear guidance for submission of revisions and next steps of approval systems (e.g., Qualtrics/IRB). Recommendations included finalizing minor IRB corrections and continuing project implementation planning. Clarifications were given on population size and data inclusion criteria.

Summary of Key Points

Key recommendations were to make the project compatible with quality improvement standards and to make it evidence-based. The objective is to increase compliance by 20% in 12-weeks, from 35.3% to 50.7%, and consequently decrease no-shows, emergency visits, and psychiatric relapses. The implementation involves staff training, scheduled reminders (72, 48, and 24 hours before), and constant monitoring using EHR data. Teaching was also about how to utilize EHRs in compliance and documentation. Faculty stated that the minor changes in the IRB won’t take a major hit in time for the projects.

Reflect on Project Progress

Work on the project was good in terms of planning, objectives, and implementation. Feedback showed that the project was feasible and met the clinical need. Faculty and preceptor interaction helps the student attain program milestones and the timely manner. The discussion also showcased how technology must be intertwined with human interaction. The developments are prepared to go once they are approved by the IRB.

Area of Uncertainty

There’s still uncertainty about a few strains of documentation that need to be tweaked, and IRB approval, of course. Further clarification is required on when things are due and when they are approved. The scalability and generalizability of the data are also questions. These uncertainties need to be addressed prior to the final submission and project execution phase.