NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2
Sample Free Download

×

    Fill the form to instantly download your free sample!

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

    Student name

    Capella University

    NURS FPX6085

    Professor Name

    Submission Date

    Problem Statement (PICOT)

    One of the stress factors that affects the new graduate nurses in a busy urban hospital, namely, in the unit of women’s services, is the transition-to-practice phase, which is accompanied by high acuity and rapid clinical situations in the clinical environment. Despite existing orientation and preceptorship models, gaps in preparing new nurses to be competent and safe in dealing with complex patient scenarios still exist, putting more pressure on them, affecting their practice variability, and exposing patients to harm. Key points in this project pertain to the needs identified, target population, proposed intervention, anticipated outcomes, timeline, and the quality improvement framework.

    Among new graduate nurses in their initial practice environment in the unit of a busy urban hospital (P) that addresses women services, does a structured, evidence-based educational intervention, that incorporates simulation-based education and specific orientation activities (I) vs the current standard process of orientation (C) enhance clinical preparedness, confidence, and skills to handle common and high-acuity situations in the unit (O) over a 612-week orientation period (T).

    Population (P): Nurses who have recently graduated and are coming into practice in a unit of a busy urban hospital that works with women.

    Intervention (I): Evidence-based, structured educational intervention: Simulation-based learning and orienting activities.

    Comparison (C): Existing standard orientation process.

    Outcome (O): More prepared to handle clinically, better-confident, and safer handling of common and high-acuity clinical situations.

    Time (T): Six to twelve weeks.

    Problem Statement

    Need Analysis

    The need identified in this project is focused on quality improvement, nurse education, and patient safety through using a structured and evidence-based educational intervention for the new graduate nurses, which involves simulation-based learning and particular orientation activities. Without proper training on how to deal with complex obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal cases, new graduate nurses are often assigned to high-acuity units of women’s services or high-workload neonatal units at big urban hospitals. Such gaps in knowledge during the preparation put patients and nurses at a higher risk of clinical mistakes, a lack of confidence, and lower quality of care. The existing literature states that stress, burnout, and unsafe clinical practice of new nurses are caused by insufficient transition-to-practice programs (Reebals et al., 2021).

    As to the organizational data, internal quality report data on related units of the women’s services reveal that new graduate nurses are likely to engage in near-miss medication errors, late maternal deterioration detection, and failure to escalate care in obstetric emergency cases during the first three months of their practice. Moreover, nurse educators complain of inconsistent preceptor assessment, where commonly there are records of a lack of emergency response, fetal monitoring interpretation, and interdisciplinary communication in the orientation stage (Ibrahim et al., 2024).

    Although formal simulation competency scores are not actively tracked, the existing orientation completion is more based on the time-related aspects than on clinical competency, which limits objective evaluation of independence of practice readiness. The assumption in this project is that the simulation resources and teaching facilities to support the intervention are available in the organization.

    Some of the factors that may have led to this problem include variability in the orientation structure, deficiency of clinical simulation with high-acuity cases, and deficiency of mentored clinical decision-making during an early transition (Elendu et al., 2024). Delays in responding to emergency or high-risk events or a lack of preparedness to handle such situations in women’s services are frequent among new graduate nurses, which negatively impacts patient safety and nurse retention. These educational voids leave the potential for adverse patient outcomes, employee turnover, and decreased quality of care.

    The currently available unit-level data also show that there is a higher turnover of nurses with less than one year of experience in women’s services; this is also a sign that inadequate preparation is leading to not just a safety risk, but also a variable workforce. Such trends can demonstrate that it is not just a matter of education, but also of operation and financial character, and that improvement in transition-to-practice is not only urgent, but also hopeless (Gautam et al., 2023). It is also assumed that the unit nurse educators, preceptors, and leadership will play a constructive role in the integration of simulation-based learning into an evidence-based approach of improving clinical competence and confidence during the transition-to-practice process.

    Population and Setting

    The specific group of the target population of this project is new graduate nurses entering their profession in a busy hospital of an urban area within the women’s services unit. This group is especially vulnerable during the first transition phase as it lacks clinical experience, and the workload is extensive, and the work with maternal and neonatal patients is rather complex (Mohammed et al., 2025). The women’s services units require swift clinical decision-making, a high degree of technical expertise, and good interprofessional communication, and therefore, an efficient education preparation is required so that they can practice safely.

    Additional difficulties, which this population may face, are performance anxiety, fear of making mistakes, inability to prioritize care in emergency situations, and low degree of confidence when communicating with physicians and senior nurses in emergency situations. In addition, varying degrees of education and varying exposure to obstetric and neonatal crises during nursing school might also result in varying degrees of baseline competency disparities among new graduate nurses during orientation. These factors can contribute to the readiness to learn, engagement in simulators, and transition success overall.

    The environment where the intervention will take place is an acute care hospital that will foster nurse residency training and education via simulation. This environment facilitates the integration of a realistic clinical setting, practice-guided and structured feedback during the orientation process. To be more specific, the targeted setting is an inpatient women’s services unit in a large city hospital with labor and delivery, postpartum, and neonatal services, where the level of patient acuity is high, and clinical degradation can occur rapidly. Examples of the obstetric emergencies that these units frequently handle are, but not limited to, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, and resuscitation of newborns, which is why competency-based training is critical in patient safety.

    The time constraints of the orientation process, staff shortage, and inconsistency of the support delivered by the preceptors are the potential barriers, yet the institutional commitment to the education of nurses and patient safety is likely to promote the successful implementation and sustainability. The inability to have simulation laboratories due to conflicting educational needs, schedule incompatibility between clinical shifts and training, and non-concerning support of the leadership depending on the staffing needs can also be included in the list of setting-specific concerns (Park et al., 2025). In order to address these problems, nursing educators, the unit managers, and the hospital administration will be forced to liaise their efforts in ensuring that the time of training is not compromised and the preceptors are involved regularly.

    Intervention Overview

    The intervention proposed in this project is an evidence-based, structured educational intervention for new graduate nurses that is a combination of simulation-based education and orientation within the women’s services unit. The program will target clinical preparedness, confidence, and safe decision-making within common and high acuity maternal and neonatal scenarios. New graduate nurses will be subjected to facilitated simulation practices, case-based learning practices, and formal clinical skills validation practices with nurse educators and preceptors. The orientation process will use feedback, self-reflecting and performance evaluation over 6-12 weeks to determine the progress and help trainees develop their skills (Salem et al., 2025). This approach emphasizes experiential learning, critical thinking, and long-term educational support during the transition to practice phase.

    This intervention is particularly applicable to new graduate nurses in a high-patient-acuity, busy urban women’s service unit, whose issue is the lack of exposure to clinical practice, and the anxiety about performing well that is often experienced by novice nurses in the initial years of professional practice. Education based on simulation provides nurses with the opportunity to train in emergency response, communication, and technical skills in a safe and controlled setting, without posing any danger to patients (Kavakli and Konukbay, 2024).

    The structured orientation model also provides similarity in the training experience and promotes progressive autonomy. Additionally, this education model is easy to be applied at large scale and affordable as its implementation is possible in terms of broader application in other inpatient units. The main focus of the intervention is to address the key aspects of reduced preparation and confidence, clinical competence, and standardized care provision.

    The potential barriers to implementation may include time during orientation schedules, discrepancies in interaction with a preceptor, and insufficient staffing to conduct simulation activities. The remaining problems may be the preferences of new graduate nurses to learning, and the unwillingness to non-traditional ways of learning. These obstacles will need to be overcome through institutional assistance, engagement of the leadership, and allotment of the right resources, which will assist in the sustained involvement and sustainability of the program.

    Comparison of Approaches

    The traditional approach to the orientation of new graduate nurses is typically the unit-based preceptorship, classroom training, and learning within the framework of normal patient care (Valdes et al., 2021). Though the model can be applied to have a real-time exposure to clinical practice, this model may not always give a standardized exposure to the high-risk and low-frequency events, such as obstetric emergencies or neonatal complications. This way, new nurses may graduate oriented and unaware of how to react critically or be capable of being confident enough to deal with high-acuity situations independently.

    Alternative interventions include other interventions like extended nurse residency, interprofessional training on the basis of simulation, and other transition programs that are directed by advanced practice educators. The assistance of long-term guidance and systematic development of the skills provides such methods with more clinical support, professional socialization, and confidence. However, such programs may be costly to invest in; they may require the involvement of more staff, time, and finances, which not all hospital systems can afford to invest in (Pradhan et al., 2024). There are some interprofessional models that are generalized with regard to nursing competencies and not women-specific service care.

    In comparison, the simulation-based orientation program developed and conducted by the nurses is balanced as it offers flexibility, realism, and is economical in terms of resources. This model promotes experiential learning, critical thinking, and high-acuity situation repetition practice, and interdisciplinary collaboration among nurse teachers, preceptors, and other individuals as an interdisciplinary team. However, regardless of possible barriers to such a program, such as the availability of simulation, the experience of teachers, and the evolving policies regarding training requirements, this approach is among the most feasible and sustainable ones in the setting of the high-acuity women’s service, rather than the traditional orientation approach.

    Initial Outcome

    The key output of this project will be to enhance clinical preparedness, confidence, and safe management of typical and critical situations in new graduate nurses by the project completion date, and after the orientation program. Baseline data will also be collected at the outset of the orientation, and this data will comprise the starting performance ratings of simulation, preceptor competency ratings on standardized assessment tools, and self-reported ratings of confidence on the validated confidence scales. Review of safety event and near-miss reports of new graduate nurses in the last three months will also establish their pre-intervention safety trend (Yang and Liu, 2021).

     Some of the secondary outcomes include the enhanced clinical competence by the use of simulation performance tests, preceptor tests, and self-reported surveys of confidence regarding the new graduate nurses (Alkhelaiwi et al., 2024). These findings are likely to demonstrate that a training intervention with a structured, simulated training will be suitable to improve the outcomes of transition-to-practice by improving the performance of the technical skills and professional confidence among the women in the service.

    SMART Outcomes

    • A minimum 20 percent difference in competency scores of the simulation prior to orientation and after.
    • An increase in self-reported confidence scores dealing with obstetric and neonatal emergencies by 25 percent at the end of orientation week 12.
    • Increase of at least one level of performance on sub-areas of clinical judgment, communications, and technical skills on preceptor evaluation rubrics.
    • Reduction of the reported near-miss or safety events in the new graduate nurses by 15 percent in three months of program implementation.

    The evaluator criteria to measure the accomplishment of these outcomes will include: (1) quantifiable difference in the scores of the simulation-based clinical performance between the baseline and post-intervention measure; (2) heightened level of self-reported confidence in regard to the ability to handle high-acuity women in the services scenarios; (3) better preceptor evaluation score in terms of improved performance in clinical judgment, communication, and technical skills; and (4 Combined, these outcome measures are indicators of a better quality of care and patient safety and a more positive transition-to-practice experience with guided educational preparation.

    Time Estimate

    It is estimated that the development and implementation of the educational intervention of training the new graduate nurses based on a structured and simulation-based approach would occur in four to five months. The initial month will be dedicated to program planning and design, during which simulation scenarios, structured orientation information, assessment tools, and communication with nurse educators and unit leadership will be created (Lysfjord and Skarstein, 2024). The second month will involve preparation of the educator and preceptor to ensure uniformity in how the simulations, feedback, and competency assessment among the other participants occur.

    This intervention will then be implemented in the next three months according to the 6-12-week orientation framework in the PICOT question. Planned simulation sessions, mentored clinical practice, and planned feedback will be included in the transition to independent practice of new graduate nurses. The potential barriers, which may affect the proposed plan, are the postponement of the educator training, the time scheduling problems related to the workforce, or the lack of resources in the simulation laboratory and clinical units.

    Quality Improvement Method

    The quality improvement model that will be used on this project shall be the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. This model would particularly be appropriate in the given case, since it is centered on trial and error, stability of test outcomes, and adaptability in real-time based on the outcome. These attributes are important in examining the effectiveness of the designed educational intervention with regard to simulation-based learning that will be implemented for new graduate nurses in a high-acuity unit in a women’s services unit.

    The PDSA cycle can assist in ensuring incremental improvements to the orientation processes, as well as the delivery of the feedback to the educators and preceptors in a timely fashion and in the capacity to refine the intervention and contribute to the nurse readiness, their confidence, and patient safety (Abuzied et al., 2023). The hypothesis is that the whole process of intervention will be guided and supported by nurse educators and the unit leadership, and that new graduate nurses will be actively involved in the process of simulation and learning to derive meaningful outcomes.

    Four phases will be used to implement the PDSA cycle. During the Plan stage, the educational modules and simulation scenarios, orientation workflows will be developed, as well as assessment tools and evaluation criteria. During the Do stage, the program will be implemented at the unit level of women’s services among the new graduate nurses, where guided simulations, structured clinical practice, and preceptor feedback will be utilized.

    The monitoring of the performance indicators, self-rated confidence levels, and the evaluation of the preceptors will comprise the study phase that will help to assess the success of the intervention in increasing the clinical readiness and competence (Alhejaili et al., 2025). Finally, the Act stage will use the findings to make necessary changes to the orientation program to scale it to be sustainable and in balance with the organizational goals to succeed in the practice of nursing.

    Literature Review

    The first two years of new graduate nurses as they move into the practice in the high-acuity units of the women’s services present significant challenges in clinical preparedness, confidence, and safe patient care. The urgency of those issues is that, unless they are prepared in the right way, they might commit some errors, patient safety will be compromised, and nurses will experience stress and turnover.

    It was mentioned that structured education programs, including simulation-based education and orientation programs specific to the transition-to-practice stage, can improve clinical competence and confidence during the transition-to-practice period to lead to overall improved staff and patient outcomes (Elendu et al., 2024). Such interventions aid in learning, being critical, and socializing in high acuity nursing environments professionally.

    As pointed out by Elendu et al. (2023), simulation-based education provides a safe and controlled environment to train on emergency and high-risk scenarios and experience and feel confident as nurses without putting patients at risk. Similarly, Kavakli and Konukbay (2024) indicated that structured orientation programs are effective in regard to the development of clinical judgment, procedural skill, and interprofessional communication because they are essential skills in a complex care setting. All these investigations prove the need to introduce certain educational interventions that must respond to the needs of the women’s services units.

    Further studies found that the problem of new graduate nurses restricting their exposure to rare high-acuity events, inconsistency of preceptor support, and the lack of formal feedback as a part of orientation were the barriers (Joseph et al., 2022). Mohammed et al. (2025) observed that new nurses might not have the confidence, experience anxiety, and error rates are higher during the process of dealing with obstetric and neonatal emergencies without specific interventions. This has been demonstrated to be achieved through repeated practice, guided debriefing, and competency validation, which help in overcoming these barriers and ensuring that one is able to be prepared to practice on his/her own.

    Finally, the new nurse transition programs have better outcomes due to interprofessional and evidence-based orientation strategies. The review by Altinbas et al. (2025) of the simulation and structured mentorship studies shows that simulation and structured mentorship programs improve self-efficacy, have superior skill performance, and improve professional satisfaction. Guerrero et al. (2022) have highlighted that the competence and safety outcomes of regular exposure to high-fidelity situations and assessments with the help of structured approaches are reinforced. The literature, in general, reiterates that the gaps that exist in the preparedness, confidence, and safe practice of new graduate nurses within the women’s services units are significant and need an organized, simulation-based learning intervention to fill the gaps.

    Ahmed et al. (2025) examined how organized simulation-based learning influences acute care clinical competence of new graduate nurses, and they discovered that the skills and confidence of the students were significantly improved, although they suggested that they should be accompanied by more orientation. Similarly, Hernawaty et al. (2024) established a relation between the aimed orientation activities and clinical errors decline, implying that the evidence-based educational activities can contribute to the perfect preparedness of the transition-to-practice phase.

    A recent paper by Casia et al. (2025) indicates that poor preparation and high stress levels, lack of confidence, and poor patient safety among new nurses are connected, and, consequently, that intensive education programs that integrate guided practice, feedback, and simulation should be implemented. Another point that Wang et al. (2025) made is that, since clinical judgment and decision-making are improved as a result of repeated exposure to stressful situations, followed by reflection debriefing, this is a very good argument in favor of orientation interventions based on simulation.

    In conclusion, it can be stated that the proposed educational activity in terms of simulation and a structured format will be valuable to new graduate nurses who practice in women’s services units since the outcomes of the research testify to the increased rates of clinical preparation and confidence, and the improved patient care outcomes. Guidance, learning, and simulation offer convenient, scaled, and effective ways of acquiring competence in high acuity situations. In addition, the systematic orientation, simulation, and feedback activities are quite consistent with the current recommendations, best practices in education, and even the inner policies, as they demonstrate that such intervention is applicable to the target population and the clinical setting.

    Evaluation of Relevance and Currency

    The chosen literature is highly relevant to the issue of transition-to-practice of new graduate nurses in high-acuity units within the women’s service, the methods of education, learning through simulation, and the orientation to promote clinical competence and confidence (Elendu et al., 2024; Kavakli and Konukbay, 2024). Most of the sources were released in 2022- 2025 to provide the latest evidence on simulation, guided practice, and development of competencies in a complex clinical environment (Joseph et al., 2022; Mohammed et al., 2025).

    These findings rely on the nursing education practice and high acuity environment that is currently in place and will be useful in structuring and evidence-based orientation programs in the practical context (Altinbas et al., 2025; Guerrero et al., 2022). Both systemic and individual aspects, which influence readiness and safe practice, are highlighted in the literature and can be used to intervene at the orientation gaps and high-acuity exposure (Ahmed et al., 2025; Ernawaty et al., 2024). Overall, it could be observed that the evidence is timely, relevant, and informative regarding how to enhance the preparedness, confidence, and safe patient care in new graduate nurses working in women’s services units (Casia et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025).

    Health Policy

    Appropriate health policy and regulatory factors are some of the factors that make the implementation of a structured and simulation-based educational intervention aimed at the new graduate nurses working in the women’s services units a success. Institutional policies on orientation programs, staffing ratios of nurses, and competence assessment provide a framework that ensures sustainability of the program, quality, and adherence to organizational standards.

    Transitions-to-practice programs also have evidence-based criteria presented by national nursing education guidelines and accreditation requirements, so that the intervention could foster safe, effective, and consistent care of patients (Brunt and Morris, 2023). Such legal and ethical provisions as the scope of practice and professional responsibility must be addressed too to make the implementation easy and make sure that the regulatory standards are not breached.

    The patient-safety standards of the Joint Commission, especially its competence-validation, high-risk clinical, and decreasing preventable maternal morbidity standards, demand organizations to implement staff training and ongoing evaluation, which justifies the use of simulation, structured orientation, and standardized competency tests. Moreover, state nurse practice acts and BON (Board of Nursing) regulations provide that nurses should practice at their competency levels and that employers should ensure that they are properly oriented and supervised, influencing the manner in which training should be provided, and in writing.

    The OSHA laws on workplace safety and exposure hazards are also reasons why nurses should be prepared on how to handle obstetric and neonatal crises safely, and this can be achieved by preparing them through simulation. The responsibility of safeguarding patients against harm and ensuring safe, evidence-based practice is reinforced by ethical standards, like the Code of Ethics provided by ANA, and therefore requires thorough preparation on an ethical basis.

    To ensure confidentiality, professional integrity, and safe learning conditions, a policy related to simulation-based education, documentation of competency assessments, and safe handling of learner data should be followed. The problem of equity and accessibility also cannot be ignored, as new graduate nurses may have numerous past clinical experiences, learning styles, and familiarity with simulation-based learning. The gaps in the current policies may be linked to the uniform approaches to high-acuity orientation, interprofessional collaboration with the paradigm of the transition programs, and regular evaluation of outcomes, i.e., institutional support and policy changes are necessary to promote equal access to quality learning materials (Geese & Schmitt, 2023).

    Conclusion

    The transition-to-practice period of new graduate nurses working in high-acuity units within women’s services is a very important time frame that can be used to ensure safe and competent practice of clinical nurses. The change in systematic orientation and working in high acuity areas can disorient the nurse and disrupt his or her preparedness, confidence, and patient safety.

    An educational intervention in the form of a planned intervention (structured intervention and simulation-based intervention provided by nurse educators) will enhance clinical competence, confidence, and skill to address more complex patient situations. Continuous assessment and cyclic improvements can be used to maximize the learning outcomes and clinical performance through the use of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle.

    For the next and 3rd assessment of class NURS FPX6085  visit:  NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3

    Step By Step Instructions to write
    NURS FPX6085 Assessment 2

    ×

      Fill the form to instantly View Instructions!

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

      To get step-by-step instructions for the NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT), contact fpxassessment.com.

      References for
      NURS-FPX6085 Assessment 2

      ×

        Fill the form to instantly View References!

        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




        Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

        Below are the references for NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2:

        Ahmed, N. Z., Hussain, N. A., None Badil, Murtaza, N. G., None Perdhoomun, Manzoor, N. Z., & Memon, N. R. (2025). Effectiveness of simulation-based learning on clinical skills competence among undergraduate nursing students. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research3(5), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1142

        Alhejaili, Bassam Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Muslihi, Reinald, P., Roque, M. Y., Alharbi, R. S., & Hammad Ali Fadlalmola. (2025). Nursing Reports15(9), 317–317. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090317

        Alkhelaiwi, W. A., Traynor, M., Rogers, K., & Wilson, I. (2024). Assessing the competence of nursing students in clinical practice: The clinical preceptors’ perspective. Healthcare12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12101031

        Altınbaş, B. C., Çalık, K. Y., Erdöl, E. K., Kırkbir, İ. B., Güner, S. G., Tezel, M., Özmen, G. Ç., Erdöl, H., & Bulut, H. K. (2025). BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04004-w

        Brunt, B., & Morris, M. (2023). Nursing professional development: evidence-based practice. National Library of Medicine; StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589676/

        Casia, P. F., Liu, F., Richmond, M. M., & Adams, C. (2025). The challenges and experiences of new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs) during the Covid-19 pandemic: An integrative review. Applied Nursing Researchhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151977

        Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine103(27), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813

        Geese, F., & Schmitt, K.-U. (2023). Interprofessional collaboration in complex patient care transition: A qualitative multi-perspective analysis. Healthcare11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030359

        Guerrero, J. G., Rosales, N. S., & Castro, G. M. T. (2022). Impact of high‐fidelity simulation exposure of nursing students with their objective structured clinical examination: A quasi‐experimental study. Nursing Open10(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1343

        Joseph, H. B., Issac, A., George, A. G., Gautam, G., Jiji, M., & Mondal, S. (2022). Transitional challenges and role of preceptor among new nursing graduates. Journal of Caring Sciences11(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.16

        Lysfjord, E. M., & Skarstein, S. (2024). Empowering leadership: A journey of growth and insight through a mentoring program for nurses in leadership positions. Journal of Healthcare Leadership16, 443–454. https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s482087

        Mohammed, H. H., Abd, A., Nagwa Abd El-Fadil Afefy, Sherif, N. A., & Ibrahim, S. M. (2025). The effectiveness of nurse-led antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy: An evidence-based approach. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03471-5

        Pradhan, R., Beauvais, B., Ramamonjiarivelo, Z., Dolezel, D., Wood, D., & Shanmugam, R. (2024). Journal of Healthcare LeadershipVolume 16, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s470175

        Reebals, C., Wood, T., & Markaki, A. (2021). Western Journal of Nursing Research44(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945921997925

        Salem, G. M. M., Hashimi, W., & El-Ashry, A. M. (2025). Reflective mindfulness and emotional regulation training to enhance nursing students’ self-awareness, understanding, and regulation: A mixed-method randomized controlled trial. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03086-w

        Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). The effect of patient safety culture on nurses’ near-miss reporting intention: The moderating role of perceived severity of near misses. Journal of Research in Nursing26(1-2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120979344

         

        Capella Best Professor to Choose for
        NURS FPX6085

        ×

          Fill the form to Select the Professor!

          Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




          Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

          Dr Lisa Kreeger => PhD, RN

          Prof. Buddy Wiltcher => EdD, MSN, APRN, FNP-C

           

          Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours

          • 0% Plagiarised
          • 0% AI
          • Distinguish grades guarantee
          • 24 hour delivery





            Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



            Enjoy Upto 50% OFF On First Order!
            Get your FPX Assessment in just 24 hours!





              Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



              Fill The Form To Get Help !





                Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



                Scroll to Top