NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3
Sample Free Download

×

    Fill the form to instantly download your free sample!

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

    Student Name

    Capella University

    Nurs FPX4000

    Professor Name

    Submission Date

    Applying Ethical Principles

    Slide 1

    Good morning, Hey gentlemen and ladies! My name is _______ and Today, I would like to discuss the role of ethical principles used in the management and prevention of vaccine hesitancy because of my name, ___.

    Slide 02

    Vaccine Hesitancy Overview

    The fact that it is now one of the greatest health problems due to the inability to reach the herd immunity level, the introduction of any epidemic, and the safety of individuals with weak immunity is caused by vaccine hesitancy or the unwillingness or refusal to get vaccinated despite the possibility to do it (Myers, 2023). This hesitancy relationship is informed by several issues, including misinformation, lack of trust on healthcare systems, cultural and religious issues, and fears of potential side effects (Neely et al., 2021).

    There are ethical issues with the vaccine hesitancy as well, as there is a need to find the required balance between the freedom of choice and the recovery of the health of the population; therefore, staging in the solution that would consider the above-stated factors, in terms of both preserving the freedoms of individuals and securing the well-being of the population.

    Slide 3

    Importance of Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy

    There is no need to underline that the process of vaccine hesitancy mitigation is of paramount importance since the health of the community, the prevention of the spreading of outbreaks, and the protection of susceptible or vulnerable groups against unnecessary hospitalization and demise are all at stake. It also helps in maintaining the health of the society, not to mention that the health resources are well used by the society, which gives it goodwill towards the health systems in society.

    An increase in vaccine acceptance is also justified by the evidence as two studies stated that vaccination acceptance within the U.S. population increased by 10.8% and 7.4% during the 2020 and 2021 course (Yasmin et al., 2021). Nevertheless, there is a hesitancy problem, and, the highest rates of it were observed in Black/African Americans and pregnant or breastfeeding women, but lower among men, confirming the existence of disparities that should be reduced by specific interventions.

    Slide 4

    Autonomy

    “Autonomy is the concept that does not meddle with a patient in terms of their right to make an informed choice when it comes to vaccination (Ajluni, 2023). In the case of vaccine hesitancy, this involves the fact that such patients should be empowered to either accept or reject immunizations, as the appropriate evidence-based information is presented. The misinformation phenomenon might pose a threat to the very autonomy, since it would distort the process of decision making. Providing educable information that is straight, well-balanced and in an easy-to-understand format will allow patients to make informed choices and trust the healthcare system.

    Slide 5

    Beneficence

    Beneficence restates the need to have medical professionals acting in the utmost interest of the patients and the society (Cheraghi et al., 2023). By encouraging the practice of immunization, the prevention of both the individual and the community against easily solvable diseases will be made easy. This entails culturally sensitive communication, developing dialogues and being flexible to listening issues of the patients with the perspective of making decisions that are informed and confident. Through the process of working with the aim to guarantee vaccination, healthcare providers make an indirect contribution to the enhancement of the health situation and the reduction of the overall burden of diseases.

    Slide 6

    Nonmaleficence

    The concept of no maleficence implies the obligation of medical professionals to avoid causing harm and is defined as a motive that does not provide harm to patients and society when prevented (Varkey, 2020). Due to the current age of vaccine hesitancy, the indirect consequences of the misaddressment of misinformation may be morbidity, hospitalization, and even death.

    Even though the right of self-determination of patients would also be violated by mandatory vaccination, failing to provide the patient with full and evidence-based information may be seen as a failure of nonmaleficence since, under such conditions, they will be allowed to suffer. Risks will be minimized by providing clear and truthful information which will enable the making of safe health decisions.

    Slide 7

    Justice

    The elements of all the aspects of justice are concerned with the significance of fairness and equality in healthcare resource and service distribution (Pratt et al., 2020). When applied to vaccination, this principle requires that all people should have equal access to vaccines and that the education outreach should be geared towards various forms of cultural adaptation so that it does not leave any segment of the population behind.

    Vaccine hesitancy raises health inequities, particularly in marginalized groups, which is why it is essential that the public health programs address these barriers by undertaking geographic, socioeconomic, and cultural interventions. Ensuring that everyone equally accesses vaccination will result in equity and reduce health-associated disparities which can be prevented (Pratt et al., 2020).

    Slide 8

    Bias and Ethical Principles

    Discrimination in establishing the vaccination process can lead to unequal education, resources, and communication, which would have an adverse effect on certain groups (Sinuraya et al., 2024). Discrimination may minimize patient autonomy because it hinders patient choice based on precise, evidence-based data regarding vaccines. There is also a risk of beneficence in cases where the medical practitioners undermine their promise of the educational process regarding healthcare disparities and failure to act in the best interest of the patient in hesitation (Cheraghi et al., 2023).

    Nonmaleficence must also be breached when prejudice cancels the credibility and the probability of it causing misinformation or late vaccination (Varkey, 2020). Furthermore, prejudice may weaken justice by lowering unfairness on accessing and achieving vaccination, especially to vulnerable masses (Pratt et al., 2020).

    Slide 9

    Sphere of Care: Wellness and Disease Prevention

    Wellness and disease prevention has the responsibility of vaccination. The advancement of vaccines ethically assists patients to make informed decisions regarding their healthcare provision and safeguards the community in general since the relationship between the patients and the healthcare provider is improved (Jalilian et al., 2023).

    The harm is prevented by explicit communication and the equitable outreach, e.g., the lack of trust or misinformation which may arise because of the lack of contact. Instead, ethical behavior results in the availing of equal access to all persons irrespective of their backgrounds to valid information on vaccines and preventive services (Jalilian et al., 2023). The existence of consistent, culturally applicable, and ethical measures in prevention of a disease are necessary in order to reach satisfactory protection of the population health and preservation of patient trust.

    Slide 10

    Conclusion

    “The ethical promotion of vaccines should be grounded on ethically sound and respectful methods that can not only counteract hesitancy but also the need to balance the rights of an individual with population health outcomes. Educating people properly will make them potent, raise trust in the healthcare systems, and make them make well-informed choices. When there is fair access to vaccines, there will be inequities among the marginalized and underserved communities, and in order to ensure fairness and integrity in vaccination practice, continuous awareness of bias that can affect the delivery of health services is necessary.”

    For the 2nd assessment of this class visit: Nurs FPX 4000 Assessment 2 

    Step By Step Instructions to write
    NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3

    ×

      Fill the form to instantly View Instructions!

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

      Step-by-step instructions and scoring guide for NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 will be provided on request. Contact FPXassessment.com to get expert guidance.

      References (APA 7 format) for
      NNURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3

      ×

        Fill the form to instantly View References!

        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




        Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

        Below are references for Nurs FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles:

        Cheraghi, R., Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V., Hassankhani, H., & Jafarzadeh, A. (2023). BioMed Central Nursing22(89), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023- 01246 4

        Jalilian, H., Amraei, M., Javanshir, E., Jamebozorgi, K., & Khiavi, F. F. (2023). Ethical considerations of the vaccine development process and vaccination: A scoping review. BioMed Central Health Services Research23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09237-6

        Myers, M. G. (2023). Vaccine41(35), 5063–5065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.030

        Neely, S. R., Eldredge, C., Ersing, R., & Remington, C. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy and exposure to misinformation: A survey analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine37(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07171-z

        Pratt, B., Wild, V., Barasa, E., Kamuya, D., Gilson, L., Hendl, T., & Molyneux, S. (2020). British Medical Journal Global Health5(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001942

        Sinuraya, R. K., Nuwarda, R. F., Postma, M. J., & Suwantika, A. A. (2024). Globalization and Health20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00987-w

        Varkey, B. (2020). Medical Principles and Practice30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119

        Yasmin, F., Najeeb, H., Moeed, A., Naeem, U., Asghar, M. S., Chughtai, N. U., Yousaf, Z., Seboka, B. T., Ullah, I., Lin, C.-Y., & Pakpour, A. H. (2021). Frontiers in Public Health9https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.770985

        Capella Best Professor to Choose for
        NURS FPX4000

        ×

          Fill the form to Select the Professor!

          Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.




          Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions

          Dr. Michelle Rose

          Dr. Marissa Dopp

           

          Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours

          • 0% Plagiarised
          • 0% AI
          • Distinguish grades guarantee
          • 24 hour delivery





            Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



            Enjoy Upto 50% OFF On First Order!
            Get your FPX Assessment in just 24 hours!





              Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



              Fill The Form To Get Help !





                Privacy Policy & SMS Terms and Conditions



                Scroll to Top